Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Javier Barranco Cosano Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In analyzing the second serve performance over the last six months, Cosano has secured 41.42% of points on their second serve, while Kjaer boasts a higher win percentage at 45.3%. This statistic is crucial for making accurate match predictions, emphasizing Kjaer's marginal advantage in this aspect of their game.

Examining return game statistics in recent form, Cosano has claimed 45.89% of points on their opponent's second serves. In contrast, Kjaer has registered a slightly lower figure of 43.25%. For first serve return points, Cosano outperforms Kjaer by capturing 32.25% compared to Kjaer's 27.72%. These stats often correlate strongly with determining the favored player in a head-to-head matchup.

In terms of dealing with pressure, Cosano has successfully saved 54.14% of breakpoints in recent times, presenting a steadier performance under pressure than Kjaer, who has saved 49.59% of breakpoints. Moreover, pertaining to break point conversion, Cosano converted 40.87% of their opportunities, outshining Kjaer's conversion rate of 31.79%. Such statistics can significantly influence in-game betting predictions when assessing either player's advantage during breakpoint situations.

When reviewing victories over the past year, Cosano has won 51.56% of their matches (W/L 33/31), while Kjaer has demonstrated superior form, winning 69.39% of their matches (W/L 34/15). Considering the level of play, Cosano mainly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, clinching 53.45% of those encounters. Conversely, Kjaer dominated the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K with a win rate of 76.67% (W/L 23/7).

Surface preferences play a pivotal role, with both players favoring clay. Cosano has a career win percentage of 62% on clay (W/L 313/194), but Kjaer leads with a stronger 73% (W/L 19/7). However, on indoor hard surfaces, Cosano has a lower win rate of 40% (W/L 6/9), and Kjaer records an even 50% win rate on hard courts (W/L 6/6).

The quality of opponents also matters considerably. Over the past year, Cosano faced players with an average rank of 249.7, compared to Kjaer’s opponents ranked at an average of 402.18. Tactically, in deciding sets, Cosano has a record of winning 40% of such matches, whereas Kjaer is ahead in tight matches, registering a 56% win rate in deciding sets.

Considering all stat comparisons across diverse metrics, Kjaer seems to have the edge going into this matchup, showing promise to triumph based on recent performance data.